Supplemental Agreement Plc

First, the parties would be well advised to consider whether they would like the original agreement to be maintained and simply supplemented or amended by the new agreement. If this is the case, the difficult question of which document should prevail over others in the event of a conflict must be taken into account. At this stage, it is also important that any document purporting to amend the previous agreement adopts, as far as possible, the same terminology that is consistent with the previous agreement and that is clear as to the intent of the additional agreement. However, there may be other reasons why the fact-by-fact execution of a complementary agreement is a good thing in such circumstances. One could stick to the fact that the underlying treaty is an act and that there is an argument that an act can only be changed by an act and not by a simple treaty. The second reason why an act might be more appropriate is for the parties to negotiate and affect the rights and rights of more than one contract. In these circumstances, a formal agreement should be more relevant in the long term. Sometimes the endorsement is just an exchange of letters and the focus is on solving the immediate problem instead of ensuring that the rest of the project goes smoothly. An endorsement cannot be considered a construction contract. This may mean that an adjur cannot identify any disputes about him or her.

This can be overcome by drawing up and scrutinizing this point before a dispute arises. One of the consequences of the economic turbulence is that many contracts and transactions are renegotiated in whole or in part. Sometimes it is because of commercial pressure and sometimes as a matter of choice. However, several issues must be considered by the parties before deciding on their new agreement. Second, the parties need to think about what lawyers call the “reflection” of the right case. Reflection is what each party puts in the agreement, and that is what the court will impose if asked to do so. Normally, this is seen in the sense of positive measures, the obligation to do something or to pay for something. But in this difficult market, it may be what we give up – to do nothing or not to assert a right or claim that would otherwise be applied.

This type of agreement must, by its very nature, be developed with caution. The next issue that the parties should consider is the impact of a complementary agreement on rights and remedies, and in particular dispute resolution mechanisms. Too often, complementary agreements are drawn up without thinking adequately about what will happen to the project in the future. Sometimes the endorsement comes down to a simple exchange of letters and, all too often, the focus is on solving the immediate problem, rather than ensuring that the rest of the project goes smoothly. For example, problems may arise with respect to lengthening of time, deviations or additional work.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email