Negotiating Shareholders Agreements

In view of the fact that, ultimately, a shareholder contract is a contract, another party may sue another party for damages for breach or, in appropriate cases, in the event of non-compliance, a specific act that would constitute a violation of the shareholders` pact, or, less often, an injunction seeking an imposing mandatory injunction to prescribe certain things. As a general rule, courts grant injunctions only in relatively limited circumstances, and the main consideration is that the court must be satisfied that injury to the applicant would not be an appropriate remedy. Dilution is essentially a right of appeal in which the triggering event is a default of the shareholder who is subject to dilution. The most common provision in the United States, where dilution is expected, is the financing of the business. Positive financing alliances for the future are common, but they are more or less important depending on the company`s objective. While the problem can be solved by making available repayment, interest, cost or security priorities for those who are progressing, another alternative is to allow shareholders who are not late to acquire the shares of those who have been defaulted. These acquisitions may be strictly proportional to late commitment and fair value or in amounts greater than that share of the value of deflation (sometimes referred to as “super dilution”). A third alternative is acquisition without face or nominal value: forfeiture. A cash call often occurs as a last resort. As a general rule, cash call clauses provide that where the company needs additional funds and this financing cannot be obtained outside, shareholders are required to make the company available in a barbaric manner in relation to their holding of shares. These sha provisions generally determine whether cash calls are structured as genuine sale of shares, shareholder loans or stock convertible loans. When it comes to negotiating shareholder agreements, it is always important to keep in mind that each shareholder may have different priorities. This may depend on a number of factors, including the percentage of shares held by that person and the respective obligations of shareholders.

Someone who owns the majority of a company`s shares might be concerned about being chairman of the board and voting. Someone who owns a minority of the company`s shares might be concerned that he or she is a director while he is a shareholder so that his voice is heard (although it may be in a minority). While a SHA and the statutes were to be completed, a SHA may include a supremacy clause to ensure that the SHA annuls the statutes (in case of inconsistency, shareholders can then amend the articles accordingly). Because the statutes follow a legal model, they are not able to deal with matters that are unique to shareholders, as this would streamline the legal powers of the company. Conversely, a SHA can address all aspects of the shareholder relationship and address issues that are unique to those shareholders or that company, and even specify other agreements that must be concluded between individual shareholders and the company, such as contracts. B work, management agreements and technology transfer agreements (for example. B, intellectual property licenses, patents, trademarks or copyrights). Disagreements or failures in relationships are common in the economy.

One of the important objectives of shareholder agreements is to ensure that there is a mechanism in place to deal with such situations. This can be done by implementing some of the terms of sale described above (for example. B put/call option, shot-gun clause, etc.). Other methods include defining dispute resolution methods, such as mediation before the start of court proceedings, or the application for arbitration.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email