Put Call Provision Shareholders Agreement

Some sale-to-purchase agreements include a “sell-off option” that is used to create a market for shareholders by allowing a shareholder to submit his shares to the company at any time. This option is to create a shareholder market and available liquidity that would otherwise not be available in many nearby companies. Call options in the SHAs haunt shareholders or the entity to compel a shareholder to sell its shares to them or the company at a certain price or a predetermined formula. A call option includes triggers other than automatic transmissions and can be an effective way to remove a shareholder from a company. A call option may be limited and cut to be exercised at a later date or date or caused by certain events such as. B where: shareholders cannot agree on specific issues; it is not possible to reach the level of approval required for specific issues, such as investments or dividends; or a shareholder is simply a problem, causes trouble or is incompatible. This article does not comprehensively address all possible concepts and variations of a SHA, but those that are most used. ATS should ideally be closed when setting up a company between the parties intending to create it and be their original shareholders, although the SHAs may be closed after the creation and operation of a business. Specific transactions or the needs of different internship investors often require different conditions and are likely to be the subject of negotiations and possible further changes. In the case of companies with different types of shares, changes in concepts may also occur, since different classes of shares have different rights and obligations, normally defined in a company`s statutes; However, all shareholders, regardless of class, are generally tied to a SHA. This section does not take into account the laws of a particular jurisdiction.

If they are faced with a stalemate, the simplest solution may be to liquidate the company. This clause may encourage shareholders to break the deadlock, as the sale of fires cannot have the effect of selling the business for what it is worth. As a result, shareholders may be encouraged to break the deadlock or sell their shares, as this would put them in a better financial position. A put option is most often requested by a financial investor as a way to withdraw from the investment in the event of a specific trigger event. Investors may also require that this provision be protected from reputational risks when the company`s activities are controversial, or to avoid commitments under money laundering legislation, etc. The method used to determine the purchase price for the exercise of the put option will be the subject of important negotiations. It is important to consider the judgment in the case of Shakthi Nath – Others vs Alpha Tiger Cyprus Investment Ltd – Others [8], in which certain investment companies granted a put option in the exercise of the shareholder contract if the following conditions were not met by the “long-standing reference”. The exit price was set at the amount invested, plus an after-tax IRR up to 19% of the amount invested.

The H.C found that, in the duty, the respondents did not want to impose the put option, but were seeking damages for breach. The petitioners were therefore bound by the contractual terms they entered into and the arbitrator`s award was upheld. Put and call obligations work best if there is diversity in the size of the stakes, they would not work well if the shareholders had equal shares.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email